Why Are 3.5-Star Reviews Considered Good in Japan? Understanding Japan’s Unique Review Culture

Foreign tourists visiting Japan often say the same thing on social media and in videos:

“How does this place only have 3.5 stars on Google? The food is amazing.”

In many countries, restaurants and hotels at that level would easily receive ratings above 4 stars. Yet in Japan, even highly praised establishments often remain in the mid-3-star range on review platforms. On the other hand, once a place exceeds 4.0 stars in Japan, it is often seen as exceptionally highly rated.

But is this simply because Japanese people are more critical or harder to satisfy?

Personally, I feel the answer is more complex than that. Many people continue visiting restaurants they genuinely love without ever leaving a review. Even when customers notice flaws or areas for improvement, that does not necessarily diminish their affection for the place. Japanese review culture seems to contain a deeper structure that cannot be fully explained through numerical ratings alone.

Even Places Praised Overseas Often Stay in the 3-Star Range in Japan

Foreign Tourists Are Often Surprised: “How Is This Only 3.5 Stars?”

When foreign tourists look up ramen shops or local restaurants they enthusiastically praised in videos or social media posts, they are often surprised to find ratings such as 3.4 or 3.6 on Japanese review sites.

In many countries, food of that quality would easily receive ratings above 4.5 stars. Many overseas visitors are surprised by the gap between their experience and Japan’s relatively modest review scores.

However, this does not mean Japanese customers dislike those restaurants. In reality, many of these places have long lines every day and loyal regular customers who have continued visiting for years. Japanese review culture seems to contain a unique structure in which numerical ratings and genuine customer support do not always align.

“Amazing” Overseas and “3.5 Stars” in Japan Can Both Be True

While overseas reviews often feature phrases like “Amazing,” “Incredible,” or “Best ramen ever,” Japanese reviews tend to sound more measured, with comments such as, “The food was delicious, but the soup was slightly salty,” or “The service was polite, although the wait was a little long.”

This is not necessarily about one side being more honest than the other. Rather, the style of expressing evaluation itself seems to be different. 海外では感動をそのまま出す傾向があり、日本では気になった点も一緒に書く傾向がある。同じ体験でも、レビューとして表れる形が異なるのかもしれません。

In Japan, “Being Satisfied” Does Not Always Mean Giving a Perfect Rating

In Japanese review culture, being satisfied and giving a high score do not always seem to mean the same thing.

Even when people are genuinely satisfied, they may lower the rating slightly if there is even one detail that stood out to them. “It wasn’t perfect, so I’ll give it four stars.” When this tendency accumulates across many users, average scores naturally become lower overall.

In contrast, overseas review culture often tends to be more polarized: if people love something, they give it five stars; if they dislike it, they give it one. Differences in these evaluation styles may be one reason why average ratings tend to differ between Japan and other countries.

Why Do Japanese Reviews Often Seem So Strict?

In Japan, “Liking Something” and “Seeing Room for Improvement” Often Coexist

Speaking personally, there is a ramen shop in my neighborhood that I visit almost every week. I like the owner’s personality, and the flavor suits my taste so well that I have continued going there for years without really noticing.

At the same time, I can still see areas that could probably be improved — the seating layout, the timing of food preparation, or the way the menu is presented. But none of those issues feel important enough to point out publicly, and I also understand that there may be practical limitations involving cost, staffing, or time. So I do not write those things in reviews. Even so, I continue visiting every week.

In Japan, it often feels natural for “I like this place” and “there are still things that could be improved” to coexist at the same time.

“It’s Not Perfect, But I Still Love It” Is a Common Feeling in Japan

In many Western review cultures, people tend to write things like “Perfect” or “Loved everything” when they enjoy an experience. In Japan, however, there may sometimes be a sense of hesitation or modesty about declaring that “everything was perfect.”

It may also be related to the fact that, for many Japanese people, it feels natural to genuinely like something even if it is not perfect. The desire to support something unfinished, or to grow attached to something despite its flaws, seems to be deeply rooted in certain aspects of Japanese culture.

Japanese Reviews Are Not Necessarily Based on a “Zero Flaws” Standard

Japanese reviews are often described as being shaped by perfectionism or a “deduction-based” mindset. Personally, however, I do not think those explanations fully capture the entire picture.

Many people continue supporting and revisiting places even when they notice flaws. Even when they point out areas for improvement, it is not necessarily because they dislike the place — sometimes it reflects a desire to see it become even better. Japanese reviews may appear harsh on the surface, but there is often genuine support and affection behind them.

A Highly Rated Restaurant Is Not Always the Right Restaurant for You

Some People Deliberately Avoid Popular Restaurants

Even if a restaurant has a Google rating above 4.5 stars with more than 1,000 reviews, that does not necessarily mean it will be the perfect restaurant for you personally.

Highly rated restaurants are often crowded. If waiting in line for an hour on weekends becomes part of the experience, that itself becomes a kind of cost. As ratings rise, more people gather, and the atmosphere or sense of comfort inside the restaurant can change. Choosing to avoid overly popular places is not necessarily an irrational decision.

Lines, Atmosphere, and Customer Demographics Also Shape Restaurant Choices

Even when a restaurant has excellent ratings, people sometimes visit and feel that “something just doesn’t fit.”On the other hand, some restaurants with average ratings become places people return to again and again because they simply feel right for them.

The atmosphere, the type of customers, the size of the restaurant, the level of crowding, or even the distance between the owner and customers — these factors are difficult to capture in review scores, yet they often become extremely important when choosing a place to eat.

Even a Bowl of Ramen Can Divide People’s Preferences

Take ramen as an example: even if two people agree that it is “good,” their evaluations may differ depending on whether they prefer thick noodles or thin noodles.Someone who prefers lighter flavors may not enjoy a rich and intensely flavored ramen shop, even if it is extremely popular.

In other words, a high rating simply means that many people like the restaurant — it does not necessarily mean the restaurant will suit your personal tastes. You could even say that highly rated restaurants are often optimized for broader, more average tastes. For people whose preferences do not align with those mainstream tastes, a 3.5-star restaurant may actually feel far more comfortable and enjoyable.

Japanese People Do Not Choose Restaurants Based on Ratings Alone

People Often Care More About Who Is Reviewing the Place and What They Value

When using reviews as a reference, many people seem to rely less on the numerical score itself and more on the actual content of the reviews.

Whether someone wants to visit a restaurant praised for its “great value for money” depends entirely on personal preference. Some people may instead prefer restaurants frequently described as “quiet” or “relaxing.” Ratings are simply averages, but the written reviews themselves often reveal the values and priorities of the people who wrote them.

Some People Read Reviews to Understand the Customers, Not Just the Restaurant

When reading reviews, some people try to understand what kind of customers tend to support a particular restaurant.

Whether a place attracts families with children, tourists, or local regulars is not reflected in the numerical rating itself. However, people can often infer those details from the wording of the reviews, the tone of the comments, and the atmosphere shown in photos. For people who read reviews this way, the star rating is only one piece of reference information among many others.

People Often Decide Based on “Whether It Fits Them,” Not Simply Because It Is Highly Rated

Reviews are records of other people’s experiences. Whether those experiences will match your own preferences cannot be determined by ratings alone.

In Japanese review culture, not everyone seems to treat ratings as an absolute standard. Rather, many people appear to use ratings as an initial filter, while ultimately deciding based on the detailed reviews, atmosphere, and whether the place feels personally compatible with them.

Japanese People Often Do Not Reduce Emotions to Simple “Good” or “Bad”

Studies Suggest Japanese People More Easily Experience “Mixed Emotions”

Psychological studies suggest that people in East Asian cultures, including Japan, may be more likely than those in Western cultures to experience positive and negative emotions at the same time.

In other words, feelings such as “I enjoyed it” and “there were slightly disappointing aspects” can naturally coexist. This reflects a cultural difference in emotional processing rather than a question of which approach is better.

Feelings Like “Bittersweetness” or “Reluctance to Leave” Can Also Be Part of Satisfaction

Japanese contains many expressions that describe emotions blending positive and negative feelings together, such as nagorioshii (reluctance to part), setsunai (bittersweet sadness), or “sweet and sour” emotions.

The feeling of “I wish I could have stayed a little longer” when checking out of a ryokan, or the thought of “I want to come back again” after leaving a favorite ramen shop, cannot always be fully expressed through a simple statement like “It was great.” These more complex forms of satisfaction may simply be difficult to fit neatly into a five-star rating system.

It Is Not Unnatural for “Affection” and “Dissatisfaction” to Exist at the Same Time

Wanting a restaurant to improve in certain ways does not contradict genuinely liking it. In fact, it is often because people continue visiting regularly that they begin noticing smaller details over time.

The reason Japanese reviews often contain suggestions for improvement is not always simple dissatisfaction. In many cases, those comments may also reflect genuine interest and attachment to the place. That distinction cannot be understood through ratings alone.

Regular Customers Are Sometimes the Least Likely to Leave Reviews

Simply Continuing to Visit a Place Can Itself Be a Form of Support

People who visit the same restaurant every week are clearly strong supporters of that business. However, that support often never appears on review websites.

Writing a review usually requires some kind of motivation: wanting to share excitement, help others, express strong feelings, or sometimes vent frustration. Simply “liking a place and continuing to visit it” does not always create a strong reason to write a review.

As a result, a structure can emerge in which the people who support a business the most are actually the least likely to leave reviews. We explore this idea of “relationship value” in the service industry in more detail in another article as well.

Some People Grow Attached to a Restaurant Through Their Relationship With the Owner

As people become regular customers, their evaluation of a restaurant often expands beyond the quality of the food itself. The personality of the owner, the atmosphere among regulars, and the feeling of being welcomed all contribute to building emotional attachment to the place.

These kinds of values are difficult to reduce to numerical scores and are often hard to fully express in written reviews.

Some People Feel a Desire to Support Places That Seem to Be Struggling

Even people who normally never write reviews may decide to leave one when they feel that “this restaurant seems to be struggling financially” or “more people should know about this place.” In those moments, reviews can become a form of encouragement and support.

This suggests that reviews are not always simple evaluations — they can also function as acts of support. We explore the structure of this “desire to support” in Japanese culture in another article as well.

There Is Also “Quiet Support” That Cannot Be Seen Through Reviews Alone

Many Satisfied Customers Never Leave Reviews

Not everyone writes reviews. Some people stay silent even when they are satisfied, others stay silent despite dissatisfaction, and some simply have no interest in writing reviews at all. There are many different types of customers.

In other words, reviews only represent the voices of people who actively chose to write them. The satisfaction and support of those who remained silent are largely invisible.

Reviews Tend to Attract People With Strong Emotions

The strongest motivations for writing reviews are usually strong excitement or strong dissatisfaction. Simply thinking “it was pretty good” is often not enough to motivate someone to leave a review.

As a result, reviews tend to attract people whose emotions are particularly intense. This structure may also help explain why some individuals repeatedly leave highly negative reviews across many businesses.

In Japan, There Are Forms of “Affection” That Are Difficult to Quantify

The atmosphere of a place, the sense of comfort, the personality of the owner, the relationships among regular customers, or even the bittersweet feeling when leaving — these forms of attachment are difficult to convert into star ratings.

Japanese service culture seems to contain many values that are difficult to express through numerical scoring alone. That may also be one reason why review scores in Japan often appear lower than overseas visitors expect. We also explore the idea of visualizing gratitude and support in Japanese culture in another article.

Summary

Japanese review culture is often perceived as “strict” by overseas visitors. In fact, it is not unusual for restaurants or hotels that receive overwhelming praise from foreign tourists to remain in the mid-3-star range in Japan.

However, this may not simply mean that Japanese people are more dissatisfied or overly critical.

In Japan, it is not uncommon for people to enjoy a service while simultaneously holding mixed feelings: liking a place while still noticing areas for improvement, wanting to visit regularly while disliking the crowds, or feeling comfortable somewhere even though it is not perfect.

Many people in Japan also value things that are difficult to express through ratings alone — such as the atmosphere, the owner’s personality, the type of customers, the sense of comfort, or the subtle relationships among regular patrons.

As a result, Japanese review culture does not always follow the simple equation of “satisfaction equals a high score,” which may make it appear unique or unusual from an overseas perspective.

Even so, many people continue returning to their favorite places for years. This kind of “quiet support,” which never appears in online reviews, may itself be one of the defining characteristics of Japanese service culture.

CoCoRo編集部

サービス業支援メディア運営チーム

CoCoRo編集部は、「感謝の気持ちをカタチにする」ことをテーマに、サービス業界における新しい価値創造を目指す情報発信チームです。​デジタルギフティングや従業員エンゲージメントの向上に関する最新トレンド、導入事例、業界インタビューなど、現場で役立つ実践的なコンテンツをお届けしています。​おもてなしの心をデジタルでつなぐCoCoRoの世界観を、より多くの方々に知っていただくため、日々情報を発信しています。​